Legal Opinion

Smith v. Dillard

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided November 7, 1922PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWest, J.

This is a motion to dismiss the writ of error. The ground of the motion is that writ of error was illegally issued because the plaintiffs in error, who were the original plaintiffs, had not prior to the issuance of the *517writ of error, paid all costs which had accrued in and about the said suit up to that time.

Upon authority of Callison v. A. C. L. R. R. Co., 82 Fla. 516, 90 South. Rep. 619, construing section 2908 of the Revised General Statutes, a writ of error may.be dismissed upon the ground stated in this motion.

The writ of error was issued and duly recorded in the minute book of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Haile v. Mason Hotel & Investment Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1916
  2. Callison v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of Florida · 1921

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Busch Ex Rel. South Florida Farms Co. v. GoodnoSupreme Court of Florida · 1930
  2. Funke v. Federal Trust Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1958
  3. Ogier v. John H. Swisher & Sons, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1961
  4. Simmons v. Gainesville Nehi Bottling Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API