Legal Opinion

Pea v. State Compensation Department

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 29, 1967PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDenecke, J.

The defendant’s predecessor, the Industrial Accident Commission, refused to accept plaintiff’s claim for workmen’s compensation benefits upon the ground that it was not timely filed. Plaintiff appealed to the circuit court, but that court granted defendant’s motion requesting the court to direct the jury to return a verdict for the defendant. Plaintiff appeals.

The plaintiff is a 58-year-old widow. In August 1964 she was injured in an automobile collision which she contends was an industrial accident. She suffered severe head injuries, including a concussion, and was hospitalized for…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Uris v. State Compensation DepartmentOregon Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Dimitroff v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Tice v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Johnson v. State Compensation DepartmentOregon Supreme Court · 1967

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Westfall v. Rust International & Underwriters Adjusting Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1992
  2. State v. KutchCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1998
  3. Johnson v. State Compensation DepartmentOregon Supreme Court · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API