Legal Opinion

State v. Kutch

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided February 26, 1998No. 16375-0-IIIPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSweeney, J.

Second degree burglary requires an unlaw ful entry. RCW 9A.52.030(1). Unlawful entry includes entry that is neither licensed nor invited. RCW 9A.52.010(3). Security guards caught Robert Kutch shoplifting at Mervyn’s in the Yakima Mall. They, by written and verbal notice, expressly banned him from entering the mall for a year. He nonetheless again entered and shoplifted at Mervyn’s. The dispositive question here is whether his violation of the notice revoking his invitation was sufficient to base the unlawful entry element of second degree burglary. We conclude that it is and affirm the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Adderley v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. State v. CollinsWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  3. State v. CargillCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  4. State v. ThomsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1993
  5. State v. BlairCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1992

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. ByarsSupreme Court of Florida · 2002
  2. State v. FinleyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999
  3. State v. KlimesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
  4. State v. KlimesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
  5. State v. TowerNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2002

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API