Legal Opinion

Patterson v. LM PARKER & COMPANY

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 14, 1968No. 68SC80PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoERis, J.

It is now well established that the Industrial Commission’s findings of jurisdictional facts are not conclusive on appeal to the superior court, even though they may be supported by competent evidence. In Askew v. Tire Co., 264 N.C. 168, 141 S.E. 2d 280, Justice Moore, after considering and discussing the cases interpreting and applying the rule, set out certain principles; among them, this:

“Where the judge is of the opinion, upon a fair and impartial consideration of the evidence in the record, that the Commission’s findings of jurisdictional facts lead to an improper assumption or rejection…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hart v. Thomasville Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  2. Askew v. LEONARD TIRE COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  3. Richards v. Nationwide HomesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  4. Jenkins v. ReichertSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1939
  5. Hunter v. . PeirsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Walker v. TOWN OF STONEVILLECourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
  2. Durham v. McLambCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  3. Craver v. Dixie Furniture Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
  4. Grouse v. DRB Baseball Management, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
  5. Hernandez-Zuniga v. TickleCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2007

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API