Legal Opinion

Guirey, Srnka & Arnold, Architects v. City of Phoenix

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided January 21, 1969No. 1 CA-CIV 597PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAMERON, Judge.

This is an action by Guirey, Srnka & Arnold, Architects, an Arizona corporation, against the City of Phoenix, a municipal corporation, for architectural and engineering services rendered as the result of a written agreement between the parties. The court sitting without a jury entered judgment for the City of Phoenix in part as follows:

“After due consideration of the law and the evidence and the arguments of counsel, the Court being fully advised in the premises, the Court finds that the provisions of Arizona Revised Statutes Section 34 — 104 preclude recovery for the plaintiff.

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Tovrea Land and Cattle Company v. LinsenmeyerArizona Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Gargaro v. Kroger Grocery & Baking Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1938
  3. Stevens v. FanningAppellate Court of Illinois · 1965
  4. Zuniga v. City of TucsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1967
  5. McFadden v. WilderCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1967

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. United California Bank v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
  2. Adams v. Frontier Broadcasting CompanyWyoming Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Sandblom v. CorbinCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1980
  4. Western Corrections Group, Inc. v. TierneyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
  5. Huskie v. Ames Bros. Motor & Supply Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1984

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API