Legal Opinion

Wondrak v. Kelley

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 20, 1935No. 25044PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJones, J.

The sole question presented is whether under the pleaded facts challenged by the demurrer, Section 21 of the building code ordinance is constitutional and is a proper and legitimate exercise of the police power; or whether the ordinance is so arbitrary and unreasonable as to abridge the rights of the defendants in their property in contravention of constitutional guaranties given them by the Fourteenth Amendment of the Federal Constitution and by Article I, Section 1 of the Ohio Constitution. When the exercise of police power by municipal authorities is challenged by a property owner who…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Nectow v. City of CambridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  2. Washington Ex Rel. Seattle Title Trust Co. v. RobergeSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  3. Thomas Cusack Co. v. City of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  4. Pritz v. MesserOhio Supreme Court · 1925
  5. City of Dayton v. S. S. Kresge Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1926

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Village of Hudson v. Albrecht, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Cleveland Trust Co. v. Village of BrooklynOhio Court of Appeals · 1952
  3. Sun Oil Co. v. City of Upper ArlingtonOhio Court of Appeals · 1977
  4. P & S Investment Co. v. BrownOhio Court of Appeals · 1974
  5. State v. CooperOhio Court of Appeals · 1991

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API