Legal Opinion

Sun Oil Co. v. City of Upper Arlington

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 20, 1977No. 77AP-541PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Whiteside, J.,

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas and raises four assignments of error, as follows:

“1. The trial court erred in holding constitutional zoning for solely aesthetic purposes; the judgment is contrary to law.
“2. Judgment for the appellee was against the manifest weight of the evidence.
“3. The court’s holding that vested non-conforming uses may be constitutionally prohibited is contrary to law.
“4. The judgment of the trial court sustaining the classifications established by the Upper Arlington sign ordinance is contrary to law.”

By this…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. BuckleyOhio Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Village of West Jefferson v. RobinsonOhio Supreme Court · 1965
  3. City of Youngstown v. Kahn Bros. Building Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Burt Realty Corp. v. City of ColumbusOhio Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Gates Co. v. Housing Appeals BoardOhio Supreme Court · 1967

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. PA Northwestern Distributors, Inc. v. Zoning Hearing BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  2. Temple Baptist Church, Inc. v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Northern Ohio Sign Contractors Ass'n v. City of LakewoodOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  4. City of Dublin v. FinkesOhio Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. Mayor & Council of New Castle v. Rollins Outdoor Advertising, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1984

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API