Legal Opinion

Gray v. Holloway Construction Co.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided May 26, 1992PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DAUGHTREY, Justice.

This workers’ compensation case involves an appeal by the employer and its insurance carrier from a judgment awarding permanent partial disability and medical benefits to the employee, Walter Gray. The appellants contend that the employee made a binding election to receive benefits under Texas law and is thus precluded from seeking benefits under Tennessee law. We disagree and affirm.

On June 13, 1986, Walter Gray suffered a work-related injury while employed in Dallas, Texas, by Holloway Construction Company, a Texas-based company. During the period that he was off…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. HuntSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Corbett v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  3. Grizzard v. FiteTennessee Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Thomas v. Transport Insurance Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Tidwell v. Chattanooga Boiler & Tank Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1931

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Eadie v. Complete Co., Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Bradshaw v. Old Republic Insurance Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Eadie v. KrauseCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2008
  4. Fonseca, Edward v. Rimax Contractors, Inc.Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · 2018
  5. GIRARDEAU, ROSEMARY v. DANNY HERMAN TRUCKING, INC.Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · 2019

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API