Legal Opinion

Gulick v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 23, 1998PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DOYLE, Judge.

James A. Gulick (Claimant) appeals an order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board, which affirmed an order of a Workers’ Compensation Judge (WCJ) terminating his benefits.

Claimant was employed by the Pepsi Cola Operating Company (Employer) as a bulk delivery driver, and on May 23, 1990, he sustained a work-related injury to his lower back. Employer issued a notice of compensation payable, which described Claimant’s back injury as a “lumbar strain,” and Claimant began to receive benefits in the amount of $264 per week.

On August 6,1992, Employer filed a termination petition…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Martin v. Ketchum, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  2. Ryan v. Workman's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  3. Hirschberg v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  4. Jeanes Hospital v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  5. Blecker v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Campbell v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  2. Payes v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  3. Donovan v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  4. City of Philadelphia v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Brasten)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  5. Richards v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API