Legal Opinion

City of Philadelphia v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Brasten)

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 3, 1999PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

2Per curiam

The Court being evenly divided, the order of the Commonwealth Court is hereby affirmed.

Justice ZAPPALA files an opinion in Support or Affirmance in which Chief Justice FLAHERTY and Justice CAPPY join. Justice NIGRO files an Opinion in Support of Reversal in which Justices CASTILLE and NEWMAN join.

OPINION IN SUPPORT OF AFFIRMANCE

ZAPPALA, Justice.

The issue before this Court is whether a criminal' indictment and prosecution constitute abnormal working conditions for the purpose of determining whether workers’ compensation benefits should be granted to an employee suffering from what we have…

3Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Martin v. Ketchum, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  2. Ryan v. Workman's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  3. City of Scranton v. City of ScrantonCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  4. Jeanes Hospital v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  5. Blecker v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by20 opinions

  1. Payes v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  2. Washington v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  3. City of Philadelphia v. Civil Service CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  4. Young v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  5. City of Pittsburgh v. LoganSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API