Legal Opinion

Ryan v. Workman's Compensation Appeal Board

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 26, 1998No. 0001 E.D. Appeal Docket 1997PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

CASTILLE, Justice.

This Court granted allocatur in this matter in order to address two issues. The first issue is whether a claimant who is involved in a work-related automobile accident and later suffers a psychological injury which is allegedly triggered by learning that she is being sued by the driver of the other vehicle in the accident should have her claim analyzed under the “physical/mental” or “mental/mental” burden of proof for purposes of determining eligibility to receive a reinstatement of workers’ compensation benefits. The second issue is if such a claim…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Bethenergy Mines, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  2. Pieper v. Ametek-Thermox Instruments DivisionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  3. Lehigh County Vo-Tech School v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  4. Martin v. Ketchum, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  5. Thomas v. Commonwealth, Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Casne v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  2. Davis v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  3. Commercial Credit Claims v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board (Lancaster)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  4. PEC Contracting Engineers v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  5. Daniels v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2000

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API