Legal Opinion

Western Steel Co., Inc. v. Altenburg

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District

Decided August 25, 2005No. 13-02-450-CVPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion by Justice YÁÑEZ.

Appellee, Hank Altenburg, sued appellant, Western Steel Company, Inc. (“Western”), for injuries sustained in a work-related accident. Following a jury trial, the jury found (1) Western was negligent; (2) Altenburg was not Western’s borrowed employee; and (3) that Altenburg was entitled to $88,313.85 in damages. By two issues, Western challenges the legal and factual sufficiency of the evidence supporting the jury’s finding that Altenburg was not its borrowed employee. We affirm.

Background

On September 14, 1998, Altenburg suffered a work-related injury to his…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Dow Chemical Co. v. FrancisTexas Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Victoria Bank & Trust Co. v. BradyTexas Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Exxon Corp. v. PerezTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Wingfoot Enterprises v. AlvaradoTexas Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Garza v. Exel Logistics, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2005

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Western Steel Co. v. AltenburgTexas Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Wesby v. Act Pipe & Supply, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2006
  3. Morales v. Martin Resources, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2005
  4. Port Elevator-Brownsville, L.L.C. v. Casados, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2010
  5. Fernando Morales v. Martin Resources, Inc., Martin Operating Partnership, L.P., and Select Professional Staffing, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2005

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API