Legal Opinion

Western Steel Co. v. Altenburg

Texas Supreme Court

Decided October 27, 2006No. 05-0630PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Per curiam

The principal issue in this case concerns the sufficiency of the evidence to support the jury’s finding that a worker injured at a steel company was not the employee, or borrowed employee, of that company and thus was not subject to the company’s affirmative defense under the Texas Workers’ Compensation Act. In affirming the trial court’s judgment, a divided court of appeals did not reach the sufficiency issue, concluding instead that the steel company was not entitled to the affirmative defense because it failed to prove that it had workers’ compensation insurance. 169 S.W.3d 347, 353. We…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Wingfoot Enterprises v. AlvaradoTexas Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Allright, Inc. v. PearsonTexas Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Garza v. Exel Logistics, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2005
  4. American General Fire & Casualty Co. v. WeinbergTexas Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Ingalls v. Standard Gypsum, L.L.C., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2001

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. Port Elevator-Brownsville, L.L.C. v. CasadosTexas Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Anzures v. Prologis Texas I LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2012
  3. Mosqueda v. G & H Diversified Mfg., Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2007
  4. Specialty Select Care Center of San Antonio, L.L.C. v. OwenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016
  5. in the Interest of N.T., a Child, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2011

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API