Legal Opinion

Garza v. Exel Logistics, Inc.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided April 8, 2005No. 02-1187PublishedCited by 107 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Owen

A worker hired by a temporary employment agency was injured while performing tasks for the agency’s client. The trial court granted summary judgment for the agency and its client, concluding that the Workers’ Compensation Act’s exclusive remedy provision bars the worker’s common law claims. 1 The court of appeals affirmed. 2 We affirm the court of appeals’ judgment as to the temporary employment agency. But because the client company did not establish that it is “covered by workers’ compensation insurance coverage,” which is necessary to come within the exclusive remedy provision, we reverse…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Texas Workers' Compensation Insurance Fund v. Del Industrial, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Johnson & Johnson Medical, Inc. v. SanchezTexas Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Wingfoot Enterprises v. AlvaradoTexas Supreme Court · 2003

3Cited by107 opinions

  1. Nicole Burton v. Freescale Semiconductor, Inc., etCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2015
  2. Dallas County v. Gonzales, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2006
  3. in Re Deepwater HorizonTexas Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Port Elevator-Brownsville, L.L.C. v. CasadosTexas Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Western Steel Co. v. AltenburgTexas Supreme Court · 2006

102 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API