Legal Opinion

Midwest Mutual Insurance v. Fireman's Fund Insurance

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided June 12, 1972No. 19439PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bussey, Justice:

In this action the plaintiff-appellant, Midwest, seeks to recover contribution from defendant-respondent, Fireman’s, in the sum of $1,500.00, such being one-half of the amount paid by Midwest to one Stephen W. Towles, in settlement of an uninsured motorist claim. Fireman’s demurred to the complaint of Midwest and answered, denying any liability. Such demurrer was argued and at the same time the cause was tried by the court on an agreed stipulation of facts. The trial judge overruled the demurrer but decreed judgment for Fireman’s on a single ground, hereinafter discussed, and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Whitmire v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1970
  2. Westerhausen v. Allied Mutual Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1966
  3. Meritplan Ins. Co. v. Universal Underwriters Ins. Co.California Court of Appeal · 1966
  4. Mittelsteadt v. BoveeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Paupst v. McKENDRYSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Midwest Mutual Insurance v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1976
  2. Boyd v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1973
  3. Mid-West Mutual Insurance v. Government Employees InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
  4. Paul v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API