Paupst v. McKENDRY
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Ervin, J.,
The sole question presented on this appeal is whether a motorcycle is a “newly acquired automobile” within the meaning of the term as used in the automobile insurance policy issued to the defendant.
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, appellant, issued an automobile accident liability policy agreeing to insure the defendant against liability. At the time the policy was issued, defendant owned a 1950 Ford coupe, which vehicle was so described on the first page of the policy under the heading “Declarations.” While said policy was still in effect defendant sold his…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Laporte v. North American Acc. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1926
- Koser v. American Casualty Co. of ReadingSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
- Deardorff, Admr. v. Cont. L. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
- Salo v. North American Accident InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
- Perry v. North American Accident InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1927
3Cited by9 opinions
- Bankes v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. HoladaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1970
- Filaseta v. Pennsylvania Threshermen & Farmers' Mutual InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
- Westerhausen v. Allied Mutual Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1966
- K & Lee Corp. v. Scottsdale InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1991
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.