Legal Opinion

State v. Davis

Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)

Decided February 9, 2011No. 04-09-00694-CRPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion by:

CATHERINE STONE, Chief Justice.

The sole issue presented in this appeal is whether the trial court erred in modifying a judgment of conviction and sentence thirty-five days after the trial court imposed the original sentence. The appeal is premised on the State’s contention that the motion for reconsideration or reduction in sentence filed by appellee, Caleb Davis, was untimely and cannot be construed as a motion for new trial or motion in arrest of judgment. Because we conclude that Davis’s timely motion for reconsideration is the equivalent of a motion for new trial, we…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Padilla v. LaFranceTexas Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Ex Parte MaddingCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
  3. State v. AguileraCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2005
  4. King v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2000
  5. State v. EvansCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. DavisCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2011
  2. State v. Austin George Patterson, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2011
  3. State of Texas v. Davis, Caleb LeroyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2011
  4. State of Texas v. Davis, Caleb LeroyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2011
  5. State v. DavisCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API