State v. Austin George Patterson
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Opinion by:
KAREN ANGELINI, Justice.
These three consolidated appeals arise from judgments of conviction and sentences for the offenses of cruelty to nonli-vestock animals. Austin George Patterson and Jordan Mitchell each pled guilty to three counts of cruelty to nonlivestock animals and were sentenced to three years’ imprisonment. In their appeals from these convictions, Patterson and Mitchell (“appellants”) argue the deadly weapon allegations in their indictments should have been set aside by the trial court because they were facially invalid. In its appeal, the State argues the trial…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Boykin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
- Vidaurri v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2001
- State v. HerndonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
- Lawrence v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
- State v. AguileraCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2005
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. Daniel Villegas, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2016
- Enrique Martinez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2016
- Brian Martin v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2015
- Christopher Burnell v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2012
- Jason Martinez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2015
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.