Legal Opinion

Catricola v. Hayes

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided December 8, 1931PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pee Ctjeiam.

The plaintiff while crossing a street in Stamford was struck by an automobile being driven by the defendant Algieri as the servant and agent of the defendant Hayes. The finding, which cannot be corrected in any material respect, states that before crossing the street the plaintiff looked in the direction from which the automobile was coming and saw it, but that it was so far away that he could reasonably expect to cross in safety. Believing this to be so he continued across the street without looking again until he was within two feet of the further curb when he was struck. He…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Porcello v. FinnanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1931

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Skovronski v. GenoveseSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1938
  2. Rosen v. GoldsteinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1942
  3. Gardiner v. HayesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1941
  4. Giannatasio v. NealonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
  5. Caines v. WofseySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API