Legal Opinion

Giannatasio v. Nealon

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided January 5, 1934PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

The defendant seeks to add many statements to the finding, but most of them are in the form of brief summaries of the testimony of particular witnesses, and would have no proper place in it. With such changes and additions as can properly be made, the finding presents the following situation: The plaintiff was walking southerly on the west side of Main Street in Bridgeport. About thirty-five feet northerly of the corner of Charles Street she looked up and down Main Street and saw no cars approaching from either direction. She started to walk directly across the street at a natural gait, and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Porcello v. FinnanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1931
  2. Catricola v. HayesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1931

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lutzen v. Henry Jenkins Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1947
  2. Kelly v. DevittorioConnecticut Superior Court · 1935
  3. Matirko v. KornConnecticut Superior Court · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API