Arkema Inc. v. ANDERSON ROOFING CO., INC.
District Court, D. Oregon
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION & ORDER
MOSMAN, District Judge.
On April 26, 2010, Magistrate Judge Papak issued Findings and Recommendation (“F & R”) (# 331) in the above-captioned case recommending that I DENY defendant Anderson Roofing Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss (# 173) on the Seventh and Eight Claims for Relief and reserve ruling on the Fifth and Sixth Claims for Relief. He also recommends that I DENY General Steamship Corp.’s Motion to Dismiss (#309). Anderson Roofing filed objections (# 335) and plaintiffs responded (# 338).
DISCUSSION
The magistrate judge makes only recommendations to the court, to which any party…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United States v. Jose Francisco Reyna-Tapia, AKA Jose ReynaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Coppola v. SmithDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2013
- Hobart Corp. v. Dayton Power & Light Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2014
- National Surety Corporation v. TIG Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2022