Legal Opinion
Johnson v. Soundview Apartments Housing Development Fund Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided November 17, 1986No. 81 Civ. 4803 (JES)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SPRIZZO, District Judge.
Plaintiffs brought an action alleging inter alia that a mandatory meal plan established by defendants in connection with certain government subsidized housing units constituted an illegal tying arrangement in violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1. See Third Amended Complaint (“Complaint”) at ¶¶ 49-56.1 Defendants moved to dismiss or, in the alternative, for summary judgment contending that the mandatory meal plan at issue did not constitute an illegal tying arrangement. The defendants further contended that, in any event, they were entitled to an…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Parker v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Jefferson Parish Hospital District No. 2 v. HydeSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Fortner Enterprises, Inc. v. United States Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Town of Hallie v. City of Eau ClaireSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Southern Motor Carriers Rate Conference, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Voss v. Lincoln Mall Management Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1988
- Gonzalez v. St. Margaret's House Housing Development Fund Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1987