Legal Opinion

Voss v. Lincoln Mall Management Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 9, 1988No. 87-1687PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stamos

This is a permissive interlocutory appeal under Supreme Court Rule 308 (107 Ill. 2d R. 308) from an order of the circuit court of Cook County entered on May 19, 1987, denying plaintiff’s motion to allow the testimony of an expert witness at the trial of plaintiff’s personal injury action. Disclosure of the expert’s identity had not been made until after the date specified in an earlier pretrial order for identification of experts and after a second pretrial order entered under Supreme Court Rules 218 and 220 (107 Ill. 2d Rules 218, 220) had barred plaintiff from offering any such expert…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. DiBella v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Gardner v. Westinghouse Broadcasting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Max Daetwyler Corp., a New York Corporation v. R. Meyer, a West German Corporation. Appeal of Rolf MeyerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
  4. People Ex Rel. Scott v. SilversteinIllinois Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Union State Bank v. WoellNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Stamp v. Touche Ross & Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1993
  2. Rozsavolgyi v. The City of AuroraIllinois Supreme Court · 2017
  3. Eshaghi v. Hanley Dawson Cadillac Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  4. Bass v. Cincinnati, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1989
  5. Morrissey v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 2002

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API