Legal Opinion
Gonzalez v. St. Margaret's House Housing Development Fund Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided August 7, 1987No. 84 Civ. 1697 (PNL)PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
LEVAL, District Judge.
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
Plaintiffs are tenants of St. Margaret’s House, a low-income congregate care housing facility in lower Manhattan operated by St. Margaret’s House Housing Development Fund Corporation. The defendants are St. Margaret’s, the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”) and HUD Secretary Samuel R. Pierce, Jr. Plaintiffs challenge the lawfulness of the imposition by St. Margaret’s House (with approval by HUD) of a mandatory meal charge as a condition of occupancy. St. Margaret’s counterclaims under…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Wright v. City of Roanoke Redevelopment & Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Martin v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Ferguson v. Metropolitan Development & Housing AgencyDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1980
- Mary Fletcher v. Housing Authority of LouisvilleCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1974
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Josefina Gonzalez, and Cross-Appellees v. St. Margaret's House Housing Development Fund Corporation, a New York Corporation, and Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- Tinsley v. KempDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1990
- Intercontinental Monetary Corp. v. Performance Guarantees, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1989
- Housing Authority & Urban Redevelopment Agency v. TaylorSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2002
- First Federal Savings Bank v. TazziaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1988
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.