State v. Dye
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWiggins, J.
¶1 This case requires us to determine whether a court may allow a witness to be accompanied by a comfort animal, here a dog, when testifying during trial. Generally, we give trial courts wide discretion to control trial proceedings, including the manner in which testimony will be presented. We recognize that some trial procedures, such as providing a child witness with a toy on the stand or shackling a defendant at trial, may risk coloring the per*544ceptions of the jury. But trial courts are capable of addressing these risks. Here, the trial court acted within its broad discretion when it…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Maryland v. CraigSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- State v. StensonWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. StensonWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. KirkmanWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. KirkmanWashington Supreme Court · 2007
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by79 opinions
- State v. LamarWashington Supreme Court · 2014
- State v. CurryWashington Supreme Court · 2018
- State Of Washington, V Mason BlairCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018
- Afoa v. Port of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 2018
- State v. HendersonWashington Supreme Court · 2015
74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.