Tarbell v. Walton
Supreme Court of Vermont
Appeal from probate. Trial by court, at the June term, 1898, Orange county, Start, J., presiding. Upon the findings, the court affirmed the decree of the probate court allowing, filing and recording the instrument. The contestant excepted.
1Opinion of the CourtRowell, J.
John Walton, being domiciled in Tunbridge, in the District of Randolph, in this State, died there, leaving a will made in Illinois when he was domiciled there. The will was probated in Illinois, where the testator left real estate on which it could operate, and a copy of it, and of the probate thereof — which, for present purposes, we treat as duly authenticated — was produced to the probate court of said district, which adjudged that said instrument ought to be allowed in this State, and thereupon filed and recorded said copy; and the question is, whether the will can be proved here in that…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Robertson v. PickrellSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Manuel v. ManuelOhio Supreme Court · 1862
- Sturdivant v. NeillMississippi Supreme Court · 1854
- Walton v. Estate of HallSupreme Court of Vermont · 1894
- Ives v. Heirs SalisburySupreme Court of Vermont · 1884
3Cited by7 opinions
- Holland v. JacksonTexas Supreme Court · 1931
- In Matter of Estate of HoldenSupreme Court of Vermont · 1938
- Payne v. PayneCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
- Seifert v. SeifertSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Barney v. HuffCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1959
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.