Legal Opinion
Abrahams v. Young & Rubicam, Inc.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided April 8, 1997No. 15404PublishedCited by 62 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BORDEN, J.
The sole issue in this appeal, on certification from the United States Court of Appeals for the *302Second Circuit, is whether, under the circumstances presented herein, the plaintiff can maintain a claim under the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act (CUTPA), General Statutes §§ 42-110a through 42-1 lOq. The plaintiff, Eric Anthony Abrahams, a Jamaican citizen, filed a ten count complaint in the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut, alleging, inter alia, that the named defendant, Young & Rubicam, Inc. (Young & Rubicam),1 a New York advertising agency,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Fink v. GolenbockSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Mather v. Griffin HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Haesche v. KissnerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Stewart v. Federated Department Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Doe v. ManheimerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by62 opinions
- Tallmadge Bros. v. Iroquois Gas Transmission System, L.P.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- In Re: Orthopedic Bone Screw Products Liability Litigation Legal Committee, at 98-1762 American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, North American Spine Society, and Scoliosis Research Society (The Medical Associations), at 98-1829Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
- Lodge v. Arett Sales Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Skuzinski v. Bouchard Fuels, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Vacco v. Microsoft Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.