Eckart v. Campbell
California Supreme Court
Appeal from the District Court of the Second District, Butte County. The case is stated in the 'opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtWallace, J.
The controversy here grows out of the provisions of the Act of March 28, 1868, providing for the management and sale of lands belonging to the State.
Eckart claims that he is a purchaser of a portion of these lands, and that he became so by having, to some extent, complied with the requirements of the Act to which we have referred.
It appears that about the 4th day of September, 1868, he made application, in proper form, to the Surveyor General for location of a half section of these lands, and obtained from that officer a certificate of location in the usual form, bearing date February 4,…
2Cited by6 opinions
- People v. California Fish Co.California Supreme Court · 1913
- Williams v. Santa Clara Mining Ass'n of Balt.California Supreme Court · 1884
- Messenger v. KingsburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- Rowell v. PerkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- Ayers v. KingsburyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.