Rowell v. Perkins
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment for the plaintiff, in the Twenty-second District Court, County of Mendocino. Temple. J. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
McKinstry, J.:
This is an action to determine a contest which had arisen in the State land office with respect to the right to purchase certain lands from the State.
The cause was submitted upon an agreed statement, from which it appears:
1. That defendant, J. J. Perkins, on the 3rd day of September, 1869, presented to and filed with the Surveyor-General of the State an application to purchase the land described in the complaint. That the application was sworn to on the 3.1st day of July, 1869.
2. That defendant Perkins was, when he filed his application, duly qualified to make such application.
3.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hildebrand v. StewartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
- Rooker v. JohnstonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
- Eckart v. CampbellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
- Yoakum v. BrowerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1877
- Copp v. HarringtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- People ex rel. Lynch v. HarrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Upham v. HoskingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
- Gilson v. RobinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Cucamonga Fruit-Land Co. v. MoirCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Withers v. JacksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.