Messenger v. Kingsbury
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. U. S. Webb, Attorney-General, Malcolm C. Glenn, Deputy Attorney-General, and R. C. Van Fleet, for Appellant.
1Opinion of the CourtSloss, J.
This is a proceeding originally brought in the superior court for a writ of mandate to compel the defendant, as surveyor-general, to receive and file an application of plaintiff made under section 3443 of the Political Code to purchase from the state a piece of land, a portion of which is swamp and overflowed land, and a portion is tide-land bordering on the waters of Suisun Bay.
Plaintiff recovered judgment in the trial court and this judgment and an order denying defendant’s motion for a new trial,- were, on the twenty-third day of February, 1909, affirmed by the district court of appeal for…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Shively v. BowlbySupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Pennoyer v. McConnaughySupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Day Land & Cattle Co. v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1887
- Frisbie v. WhitneySupreme Court of the United States · 1870
- Hutchings v. LowSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- People v. California Fish Co.California Supreme Court · 1913
- Atwood v. HammondCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- People v. ChambersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- West Coast Advertising Co. v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- Dexner v. HoughtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.