Legal Opinion

Yates v. Dobson

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 15, 1925No. 5 Div. 924PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMiller, J.

IX M. Yates, plaintiff in judgment against W. W. Dobson, defendant, sued out a writ of garnishment on the judgment against the Merchants’ & Farmers’ Bank, a corporation. The garnishee answered, stating under oath that defendant in the judgment had the sum of $550.30 on deposit with it. The defendant filed claim to this money, $550.30, as exempt. The plaintiff contested the exemption claim on the grounds the claim is invalid; that it is invalid in part or is excessive, in that he fails to state the true value of said property, and it is excessive in its entirety; that the different articles of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Lamar v. KingSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
  2. McGehee v. Western Union Tel. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1910
  3. Stull v. Daniel MacH. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1922
  4. Beadle v. DavidsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1883
  5. Mooneyham v. HerringSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Battle v. WrightSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  2. Ex Parte CampbellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API