Legal Opinion

Stull v. Daniel MacH. Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 18, 1922No. 6 Div. 643PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMiller, J.

D. L. Stull sues W. H. Daniel, doing business as Daniel Machine Company, for $1,000 due by promissory note made by him, waving exemptions as to personal property and agreeing to pay a reasonable attorney’s fee for its collection. The defendant pleaded general issue, payment, failure of consideration and three pleas of set-off. There was verdict for defendant for $226.67, judgment thereon by the court, and an appeal therefrom by the plaintiff.

The plaintiff’s motion to strike “the claim of damages” in the set-off plea, numbered 5, was overruled and refused by the court The motion is to strike…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. TrammellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  2. Morrison v. ClarkSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  3. Equitable Accident Insurance v. OsbornSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  4. Moore v. . PotterNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
  5. Goldsmith, Forcheimer & Co. v. PicardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1855

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Engel v. DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1952
  2. Butler v. WaltonAlabama Court of Appeals · 1951
  3. Blankenship v. LanierSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
  4. Benefit Ass'n Ry. Employees v. BraySupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  5. Southern Ry. Co. v. Lime Cola Bottling Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1923

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API