Legal Opinion
Battle v. Wright
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided March 29, 1928No. 7 Div. 787PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.
The hill of exceptions was presented to the trial judge on June 6, 1927, which was signed by him on August 6, 1927.
A proper and seasonable motion to strike the bill of exceptions, alleging that it was not signed within the mandatory terms of the statute (section 6433, Code of 1923; Ex parte Hill, 205 Ala. 631, 89 So. 58), invokes the jurisdiction of this court to that end (section 6434, Code of 1923; Ettore v. State, 214 Ala. 99, 106 So. 508; Godfrey v. Vinson, 215 Ala. 166, 110 So. 13).
It is insisted by counsel for appellant that the 6th day of August, 1927, fell on Sunday. A reference to a…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Godfrey v. VinsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
- Cox v. HuttoSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
- Ex Parte HillSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
- Obear-Nester Glass Co. v. Mobile Drug Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1922
- Illinois Cent. R. Co. v. PoseySupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Beatty v. McMillanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
- Patterson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
- MacErtney v. GwinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
- Clark v. HendersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1943
- Avery v. KelleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1942
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.