Legal Opinion

Mooneyham v. Herring

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 11, 1923No. 4 Div. 77PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSayre, J.

The report of a former appeal may be found in 204 Ala. 332, 85 South. 390, where the nature of the case is stated. On the trial which followed the return of the cause to the circuit court, a jury again found for the claimant, and again the plaintiff has appealed.

The first fifty-seven assignments of er ror are treated generally, and not in detail, in appellant’s brief, and we have found no compelling reason why we should treat them differently. Our judgment is that most of the evidence admitted over appellant’s objection was relevant to the issue whether claimant occupied the premises as…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lamar v. KingSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
  2. Mooneyham v. HerringSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Catts v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  2. American Nat. Ins. Co. v. MossSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  3. Williams v. ClarkSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955
  4. Davis v. WolffCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1974
  5. New York Life Ins. Co. v. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1944

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API