Legal Opinion

Kaufman v. Leard

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided June 5, 1969PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhittemore, J.

The plaintiffs (the Kaufmans) brought a bill in equity under G. L. c. 214, § 3 (3), so as to have disposed of in one proceeding the claims arising out of the remodeling in 1961 of their house at 147 Highland Avenue, Newton. These included a pending action by the general contractor (the defendant Leith L. Leard), a pending suit by the painter (the defendant E. J. Noel & Sons, Inc. [Noel]), and the Kaufmans’ claim against the architect (the defendant Arthur H. Brooks, Jr.). Leard and Noel set up their claims in the Kaufmans’ interpleader suit by way of counterclaim. Brooks counterclaimed for an…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. The Edward Barron Estate Co. v. the Woodruff Co.California Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Air Technology Corp. v. General Electric Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1964
  3. Coe v. CoeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
  4. Cygan v. MegathlinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1951
  5. Capitol Hotel Co. v. RittenberryCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Town Planning & Engineering Associates, Inc. v. Amesbury Specialty Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  2. New England Acceptance Corp. v. American Manufacturers Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1976
  3. R & S Construction Co. v. BDL Enterprises, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Williams Engineering, Inc. v. GoodyearSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1986
  5. Stamski & McNary, Inc. v. AndersonMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1996

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API