Legal Opinion
R & S Construction Co. v. BDL Enterprises, Inc.
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided June 2, 1993No. 17898PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SABERS, Justice.
Owner, who was determined liable to builder for additional costs of construction, claims architect should bear greater responsibility for those construction costs attributable to architect’s negligence. We agree and reverse and remand.
FACTS
On October 24, 1985, BDL Enterprises, Inc. (BDL) contracted with TSP Two, Inc. (TSP), an architectural firm, for TSP to provide architectural services for the design and construction of the Twin City Mall (Mall or project) in Lead, S.D. The project was to be conducted under a “fast track/design build” approach. Although this term was not…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Permann v. South Dakota Department of Labor, Unemployment Insurance DivisionSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
- In the Interest of A.D.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
- Knodel v. BD. OF CTY. COM'RS, ETC.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
- Insurance Agents, Inc. v. ZimmermanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
- Kaufman v. LeardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1969
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. VostadSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- Talley v. TalleySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- Black Hills Central Railroad v. City of Hill CitySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
- Matter of Guardianship of RichSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- First Dakota National Bank v. MaxonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.