Legal Opinion

Stamski & McNary, Inc. v. Anderson

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided November 18, 1996PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMerrick, J.

This is an action to recover for engineering and surveying services provided to defendant John H. Anderson (“the Architect”) by plaintiff Stamski and McNary, Inc. (“the Engineer”) pursuant to a written contract. The trial court allowed the Engineer’s Mass. R. Civ. P., Rule 56 motion for summary judgment, and the Architect filed this Dist./Mun. Cts. R. A. D. A., Rule 8C appeal. The sole defense raised by the Architect is that he entered into the contract on behalf of a disclosed principal and is, therefore, not personally liable.

The contract was prepared by the Engineer on a Massachusetts…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Evans v. Multicon Construction Corp.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1991
  2. Cowan v. EASTERN RACING ASSOCIATION, INC.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1953
  3. East Cambridge Savings Bank v. WheelerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
  4. Morgan v. Town of BurlingtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
  5. ATLANTIC SALMON A/S v. CurranMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1992

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Rosano-Davis, Inc. v. SastreMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2004
  2. Farynaz v. BurwenMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API