Legal Opinion

Robertson v. Hansen

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided June 24, 1965No. 9516PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McFADDEN, Justice.

Plaintiff Gilbert Robertson, appellant herein, instituted this action to recover commission claimed due and owing him as a real estate broker, by reason of the sale of certain real property of the defendants, James L. Hansen and Emmaline E. Hansen, husband and wife, respondents herein. By his complaint, appellant alleged that he was a licensed real estate broker and that he entered into the service of the respondents in such capacity at their request; that he procured and negotiated a sale of the respondents’ real property upon terms and conditions agreeable to the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Muir v. KaneWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Buratti & Montandon v. TennantTexas Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Weatherhead v. CooneyIdaho Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Williams v. Texas Employers' Ins. Ass'n.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1948
  5. Carney v. McGinnisNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1961

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Callies v. O'NEALIdaho Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Gray v. KohlhaseCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
  3. Isaguirre v. EchevarriaIdaho Supreme Court · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API