Carney v. McGinnis
New Mexico Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
CARMODY, Justice.
The defendants below seek a reversal of the judgment entered against them in the trial court, based upon plaintiffs’ claimed real estate commission.
This is the second time this case has been before us. The first appeal resulted in the reversal of a judgment rendered in favor of the defendants at the close of the plaintiffs’ case. See Carney v. McGinnis, 1958, 63 N.M. 439, 321 P.2d 626. At the second trial, the court, without a jury, granted plaintiffs, the real estate brokers, judgment for $3,300.
The basic facts are not in controversy. Plaintiffs had been attempting to sell…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Tiller v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Zlotziver v. ZlotziverSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
- Barthel v. StammCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1944
- Heay v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1952
- Jamison v. HydeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Anchorage-Hynning & Co., a District of Columbia Limited Partnership v. Thomas G. MoringielloCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
- Yrisarri v. WallisNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
- Chavez v. KitschNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1962
- Gray v. KohlhaseCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
- Holman v. Oriental RefineryNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1965
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.