Legal Opinion
Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. v. Pardo
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided February 14, 2017No. AC38127PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLavery, J.
The defendant Carlos A. Pardo appeals from the denial of his motion to dismiss and motion to open the judgment of strict foreclosure rendered by the trial court in favor of the plaintiff, Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as Trustee under the Pooling Servicing Agreement relating to IMPAC Secured Assets Corp., Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2007-3. 1 He claims that the court improperly (1) denied his motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, and (2) dismissed, pursuant to General Statutes § 49-15, 2 his motion to open the judgment of strict foreclosure as moot.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Farmers & Mechanics Savings Bank v. SullivanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- New Milford Savings Bank v. JajerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- GMAC Mortgage, LLC v. FordConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
- Florian v. LengeConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- First National Bank of Chicago v. LueckenConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. v. FraboniConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
- Lending Home Funding Corp. v. REI Holdings, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2022
- Pennymac Corp. v. TarziaConnecticut Appellate Court · 2022
- Bank of New York Mellon v. HorseyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2024
- U.S. Bank National Assn. v. MelconConnecticut Appellate Court · 2025
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.