Legal Opinion

Harada v. Ellis

Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals

Decided August 3, 1983No. 8871; CIVIL NO. 586PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

BURNS, C.J.

In this foreclosure case, which began in 1964, defendantscounterclaimants Masaru Sumida, Charley T. Shiraishi, Stanley Unten, and Florence A. Ellis (defendants) appeal the lower court’s judgment in favor of co-counterclaim defendant David B. Cassidy (Cassidy), whose only involvement in this case is that he purchased the property at the foreclosure sale in 1972. We affirm and also hold that Cassidy is entitled to an award of reasonable attorneys’ fees on appeal.

The issues and our answers are as follows:

I. Did the lower court err in dismissing defendants’…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ellis v. CassidyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
  2. Food Pantry, Ltd. v. Waikiki Business Plaza, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Harada v. BurnsHawaii Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Fleming v. Napili Kai, Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Silver v. Queen's HospitalHawaii Supreme Court · 1981

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. TSA International Ltd. v. Shimizu Corp.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1999
  2. S. Utsunomiya Enterprises, Inc. v. Moomuku Country ClubHawaii Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Azer v. MyersHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. Kaapu v. Aloha Tower Development Corp.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Baldonado v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co.Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1996

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API