Legal Opinion

Kaapu v. Aloha Tower Development Corp.

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided July 24, 1991No. 14734PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

LUM, C.J.

This is an appeal from an order expunging a lis pendens. Appellant, Kekoa Kaapu, has no legitimate claim or interest in the land, and, therefore, has no standing to file a lis pendens. We affirm.

I

Appellant contested the procedures used by Aloha Tower Development Corporation, appellee, in a hearing to select a developer for the Aloha Tower project. The contest was based on lack of proper notice, failure to make the hearing a contested hearing, and also on the assertion that the Sunshine law had been violated, in that the public was not made aware of the various…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Trustees of the Office of Hawaiian Affairs v. YamasakiHawaii Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Moseley v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  3. Harada v. EllisHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1983

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. TSA International Ltd. v. Shimizu Corp.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1999
  2. S. Utsunomiya Enterprises, Inc. v. Moomuku Country ClubHawaii Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Knauer v. FooteHawaii Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Lathrop v. SakataniHawaii Supreme Court · 2006
  5. GGS (HI), Inc. v. New York Diamond, Inc.Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1997

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API