Kaapu v. Aloha Tower Development Corp.
Hawaii Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT BY
LUM, C.J.
This is an appeal from an order expunging a lis pendens. Appellant, Kekoa Kaapu, has no legitimate claim or interest in the land, and, therefore, has no standing to file a lis pendens. We affirm.
I
Appellant contested the procedures used by Aloha Tower Development Corporation, appellee, in a hearing to select a developer for the Aloha Tower project. The contest was based on lack of proper notice, failure to make the hearing a contested hearing, and also on the assertion that the Sunshine law had been violated, in that the public was not made aware of the various…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Trustees of the Office of Hawaiian Affairs v. YamasakiHawaii Supreme Court · 1987
- Moseley v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Harada v. EllisHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1983
3Cited by9 opinions
- TSA International Ltd. v. Shimizu Corp.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1999
- S. Utsunomiya Enterprises, Inc. v. Moomuku Country ClubHawaii Supreme Court · 1994
- Knauer v. FooteHawaii Supreme Court · 2003
- Lathrop v. SakataniHawaii Supreme Court · 2006
- GGS (HI), Inc. v. New York Diamond, Inc.Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1997
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.