Legal Opinion

Cheney v. Bank of Bremen

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 7, 1920No. 10863PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Complaint; from Haralson superior court — Judge Irwin. July 1, 1919.

1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, P. J.

1. “ When an admission is given in evidence, it is the right of the other party to have the whole admission and all the conversation connected therewith.” Civil Code (1910), § 5783. “In all cases where the personal representative of the deceased or insane party has introduced a witness interested in the event of a "suit, who has testified as to transactions or communications on the part of the surviving agent or party with a deceased or insane party or agent, the surviving party or his agent may be examined in reference to such facts testified to by said witness.” Civil Code (1910), § 5858…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ullman v. Brunswick Title Guarantee & Loan Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1895
  2. Lazenby v. Citizens BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
  3. Holston v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  4. Bank of Southwestern Georgia v. McGarrahSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  5. Birmingham Lumber Co. v. Brinson & SonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1894

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Trammell v. ShirleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1928
  2. Shannon v. KaylorCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
  3. Levin v. Northwestern National BankSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  4. Watson v. Planters & Citizens BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
  5. Kasnowitz v. Manufacturers Trust Co.City of New York Municipal Court · 1939

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API