Kasnowitz v. Manufacturers Trust Co.
City of New York Municipal Court
1Opinion of the CourtSchackno, J.
Plaintiffs move under rule 109 of the Rules of Civil Practice for an order striking out the second and third affirmative defenses from the answer of the defendant Manufacturers ¡Trust Company as insufficient in law upon the face thereof. Plaintiffs, as copartners, maintained a check account under their firm *546name in one of the branch banks of this defendant. Their complaint alleges that they issued two checks, both to the order of the impleaded defendant, Hope Bag, Inc., one week apart in the sums of $12 and $14, and that on presentment of these checks the bank paid out of their account…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Ultramares Corp. v. ToucheNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Critten v. Chemical National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
- Gutfreund v. East River National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
- Broderick & Bascom Rope Co. v. Margaret McGrath & Henry J. McCoy Co.New York Supreme Court · 1913
- Cheney v. Bank of BremenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1920
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In re the Accounting of GlennNew York Surrogate's Court · 1951
- Kasnowitz v. Manufacturers Trust Co.City of New York Municipal Court · 1939