Legal Opinion

Lomax v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 30, 1988No. Appeal 1260 C.D. 1987PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Senior Judge Narick,

Before us is an appeal by Edna Savage (Claimant) from a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board) denying benefits. We affirm.

Claimant is the mother of Decedent (Ronald Lomax) and was dependent upon her son for support. On or about July 31, 1980, Claimant filed a claim petition against Respondent Leonard Mitchell (Mitchell) and a second petition against Respondent Trent Financial Corporation alleging that Decedent died on March 7, 1980 as a result of his employment.

The referee made the following relevant findings of fact:

5. The decedent, at the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Blue Bell Printing v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  2. Haas v. Brotherhood of Transportation WorkersSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  3. Abbotts Dairies v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Rox Coal Co. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  2. Rox Coal Co. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  3. Franks v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  4. Burger King v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  5. Meeks v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API