Legal Opinion
Blue Bell Printing v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided April 5, 1988No. Appeal, No. 1635 C.D. 1987PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Senior Judge Narick,
This is an appeal by Blue Bell Printing Company (Blue Bell) from a decision of the Workmens Compensation Appeal Board (Board) affirming a referees decision which concluded that Thomas C. Lattanzi (Claimant) suffered an aggravation of a pre-existing condition during the course of his employment with Blue Bell rather than a recurrence of a prior work-related injury.
*205The essential facts in this matter are as follows. On May 29, 1981, Claimant originally received compensation for a back injury while employed by Montgomery Publishing Company (Montgomery). On December…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Universal Cyclops Steel Corp. v. KrawczynskiCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Kirkwood v. UN. COMP. BD. OF REV.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Krawchuk v. Philadelphia Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Pawlosky v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Kraemer v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Johnson v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Somerset Welding & Steel v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- SKF USA, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Lynch v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Shaw's Supermarkets, Inc. v. DelgiaccoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.