Legal Opinion

Franks v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 14, 1992No. 2421 C.D. 1990PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BLATT, Senior Judge.

Robert Franks (claimant) petitions for review of an order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board) which affirmed the decision of the referee denying benefits in accordance with Section 301(a) of The Pennsylvania Workmen’s Compensation Act. 1 We reverse.

The claimant was employed as a cashier by SEPTA (employer). On April 27, 1988, he filed a claim petition for neck and back injuries, aggravation of hypertension, and psychological injuries received at work on January 11, 1987, during the course of his arrest for theft. 2 Before the referee, both the claimant and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Abbotts Dairies v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. Burger King v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  3. Lomax v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Graves v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  2. Murphy v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  3. City of Philadelphia v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  4. Erisco Industries, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  5. Wright v. DennyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API