Grady v. State
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
MACY, Justice.
Appellant Floyd Grady appeals from his conviction for first-degree sexual assault.
We affirm.
ISSUE
Appellant presents a single issue for our review:
Whether the trial court erred in failing to grant Appellant’s pre-sentence motion to withdraw his guilty plea?
FACTS
On November 17, 1994, Appellant was charged with first-degree sexual assault. 1 Appellee State of Wyoming accused Appellant of forcing the victim to have intercourse with him by holding a knife to her throat and hitting her. At his arraignment, Appellant pleaded not guilty to the charge. Pursuant to Appellant’s request,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Martinez v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1980
- Jackson v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1995
- Rude v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
- Vigil v. RuettgersWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
- McCarty v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Johnson v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1996
- Burdine v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1999
- McCarthy v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1997
- Holcomb v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2007
- Board of Professional Responsibility v. MurrayWyoming Supreme Court · 2006