Legal Opinion

Grady v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided April 17, 1996No. 95-204PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MACY, Justice.

Appellant Floyd Grady appeals from his conviction for first-degree sexual assault.

We affirm.

ISSUE

Appellant presents a single issue for our review:

Whether the trial court erred in failing to grant Appellant’s pre-sentence motion to withdraw his guilty plea?

FACTS

On November 17, 1994, Appellant was charged with first-degree sexual assault. 1 Appellee State of Wyoming accused Appellant of forcing the victim to have intercourse with him by holding a knife to her throat and hitting her. At his arraignment, Appellant pleaded not guilty to the charge. Pursuant to Appellant’s request,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Martinez v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Jackson v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Rude v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Vigil v. RuettgersWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
  5. McCarty v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1994

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Johnson v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Burdine v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1999
  3. McCarthy v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Holcomb v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Board of Professional Responsibility v. MurrayWyoming Supreme Court · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API