Legal Opinion

Holcomb v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided August 16, 2007No. 06-288PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VOIGT, Chief Justice.

[11] This is an appeal from the sentence imposed upon the appellant after he pled guilty to felony stalking pursuant to a plea agreement. The issue presented is whether the district court abused its discretion or erred as a matter of law when, prior to sentencing, it denied the appellant's motion to withdraw his plea. We reverse.

FACTS

[12] At a change-of-plea hearing in district court, the appellant pled guilty to felony stalking. He did so pursuant to a plea agreement, the primary term of which was that "we have agreed to propose to the sentencing judge that he be…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Vaughn v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Mehring v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1993

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Jones v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Roy David Stanger v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API