Legal Opinion

Johnson v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided September 16, 1996No. 95-209PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEHMAN, Justice.

The dispositive issue in this case is whether the district court abused its discretion in refusing to allow appellant to withdraw his plea of nolo contendere subsequent to sentencing.

We affirm.

On February 28, 1994, Darrell Johnson was charged "with one count of sexual assault in the second degree, in violation of W.S. 6-2-303 (1988), and one count of taking indecent liberties with a minor, in violation of W.S. 14r-3-105 (1994). At the conclusion of trial, the jury was unable to reach a verdict. A mistrial was declared, and a new trial date was set. This second trial, however,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Osborn v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Jackson v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Zanetti v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Snyder v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Rude v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1993

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Ward v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 2010
  2. State v. BolligWisconsin Supreme Court · 2000
  3. State v. BurrNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Ray v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Kaiser v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API